Skip Navigation LinksAbout Perkins Resources » News & Articles

Urgent action needed on innovation

07 May 2008

by: Peter Laver

Courtesy of ScienceAlert: Australia and New Zealand

Australia urgently needs to strengthen its national innovation system.

We should start by developing a 10-year strategic plan to boost innovation, involving all key stakeholders, that includes investment milestones and performance.

A key priority is to develop a strategic national intelligence capability that explores critical emerging issues through horizon scanning, technology roadmaps and foresight – and provides findings that can be understood and acted on.

Australian support for innovation is presently too focused on assisting research. New mechanisms are required to use the results of this research – assistance measures which recognise the high costs and risks in the later stages of technological innovation.

Australia must increase collaboration between private and public sectors, and between research providers and the users of research outcomes. This will require top-down facilitation, including additional funding. It will also require the creation of an environment in which bottom-up collaboration is encouraged.

Business should be able to readily access public sector research skills by using, as necessary, publicly funded intermediaries or other mechanisms.

The Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) Program has achieved many excellent outcomes and helped to improve research management and training of researchers in Australia. The CRC Program should be continued, expanded and diversified.

There is scope for two (or possibly more) categories of CRCs, each with some common characteristics but having different guidelines, depending on their objectives. We should have CRCs with commercially focused outcomes and CRCs that are primarily directed towards non-commercial objectives.

More flexibility is required in the Program to accommodate different sizes and funding durations for CRCs and we should establish a new mechanism to fund collaborative research for projects that are smaller (and involve shorter time frames) than a CRC, but are bigger than Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage grant funding provides.

Australia needs to revise financial incentives for innovation – restoration of the R&D tax concession to its value when it was introduced and was highly effective would mean increasing it to 200 per cent. There also needs to be a higher turnover limit for the R&D Tax Offset and other improvements to fiscal incentives in order to increase business expenditure on R&D.

The cornerstone of innovation is the classroom – we need to embed the concept of innovative thinking in curricula and pedagogy. We should improve the teaching of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in Australian schools, by making teaching more attractive to STEM graduates and providing better teaching resources.  We must increase the numbers of STEM graduates from Australian universities by mechanisms such as reducing fees in these disciplines.

Australia should assist firms (especially small and medium-sized enterprises – SMEs) to develop products that government agencies are interested in buying.  We could demonstrate the priority we have assigned to innovation by establishing an annual Prime Minister's Prize for the application of Australian-developed scientific discoveries to sit alongside the existing Prime Minister’s Science Prize.

We should improve the commercialisation of public sector research results by supporting training and adoption of best practice in knowledge commercialisation.

Finally, we should include an element in the new university block funding formula which rewards investment in proof-of-concept and innovation/commercialisation activities.

Peter Laver AM FTSE is Vice President of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (ATSE) and a former senior BHP executive and  Chancellor of Victoria University. This article draws on the ATSE submission to the Review of the National Innovation System chaired by Dr Terry Cutler.

View source web page here.

back to news »

Agreements could be history by Easter |